Cheerleading Poms

Choose poms by their intended use: smaller, lighter poms (handheld or 3–5 ounces each) work for fast-motion routines and younger athletes; larger, heavier poms (6–8+ ounces) create fuller visual impact for sideline performances. Check listed dimensions and whether handles are single or double for grip preference

Poms are typically made from plastic (polypropylene or PET) for shine and durability or mylar for extra shimmer; plastic offers lighter weight and quieter movement, while mylar gives more sparkle but can be stiffer. Material affects durability, noise, and how the pom moves and reflects light

Prices vary by material, size, and brand; expect budget team-style poms under $50, mid-range poms around $50–$100, and specialty or heavier competition poms above that. Average prices in the category tend to fall in the moderate range, so compare features against cost

Competition and school rules can restrict pom size, weight, color, or handle type, and may prohibit props with hard edges; always check your event or organization guidelines before purchasing to ensure compliance. Also confirm that handles allow secure grip to prevent drops during routines

Store poms in a cool, dry place away from crushing pressure; fluff by shaking or running fingers through strands and let crushed strands air out. Clean by spot-wiping handles and avoiding heat; for tangled strands, gently separate by hand rather than cutting

If uniform appearance is a priority, choose poms offered in team colors or that can be color-matched; customizable options let you add logo wraps or colored inserts but may increase lead time and cost. For consistent look, buy sets from the same brand and production batch when possible

Common handle types include single-loop plastic, double-loop fabric, and pistol-grip styles; single-loop suits standard motions and quick exchanges, double-loop adds stability for younger or less experienced athletes, and pistol-grip offers ergonomic control for complex choreography. Choose based on comfort, routine complexity, and coach preference