Researching Crime and Justice: Tales from the Field vs Design Thinking Research: Investigating Design Team Performance (Understanding Innovation)
Overall winner: Researching Crime and Justice: Tales from the Field
Key Differences
Researching Crime and Justice (Louise Westmarland) targets crime and field research with multiple reviewer endorsements and appeals to both researchers and practitioners, while Design Thinking Research (Christoph Meinel, Larry Leifer) focuses on design team performance with authoritative authorship but only a single review. A is positioned with stronger user feedback; B is positioned as a specialist volume on design-team performance
Researching Crime and Justice: Tales from the Field
An academic-style book on crime and justice fieldwork. Offers insights from real-world experiences to inform market research in criminal justice topics. customer insight: mixed impressions on depth of case examples
Pros
- real-world field insights
- academic focus on crime and justice
- clear author expertise
Cons
- limited customer data
- few reviews available
- niche subject
Design Thinking Research: Investigating Design Team Performance (Understanding Innovation)
A scholarly text exploring how design teams perform within innovation processes. Provides insights into team dynamics and research methods for evaluating design outcomes. Customer feedback highlights interest in methodology and performance analysis
Pros
- rigorous design-focused research
- insight into team performance
- applies to innovation projects
Cons
- limited customer insight data available
- single rating sample
- no features listed
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | Christoph Meinel, Larry Leifer |
| Durability | Tie |
| Versatility | Tie |
| User Reviews | Louise Westmarland |