Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX lens vs Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens
Overall winner: Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX lens
Key Differences
Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM (A) is significantly more compact and sits at a more affordable price point with praise for sharp images, while Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX (B) offers faster, more accurate autofocus and better low-light performance on DX bodies. Choose A if you want a lightweight, value-oriented wide-angle for Canon EF-S systems; choose B if you need stronger low-light capability and quicker AF on Nikon DX cameras
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX lens
Compact prime for Nikon DX DSLRs with fast f/1.8 aperture for low-light and shallow depth of field. Users note strong image clarity and smooth autofocus in varied conditions
Pros
- fast fixed-aperture performance
- bright for low light
- good image clarity
- smooth autofocus
Cons
- designed for DX-format cameras
- may perform differently on FX bodies
Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens
Compact wide-angle lens for Canon APS-C cameras with 24mm focal length and f/2.8. Delivers sharp images with soft backgrounds; praised for portability and lightweight design
Pros
- compact and lightweight
- sharp image quality
- wide-angle for APS-C
- smooth circular bokeh
Cons
- occasional slow autofocus
- some users report slower performance
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | Canon |
| Durability | Tie |
| Versatility | Nikon |
| User Reviews | Canon |