Neewer 16-channel wireless studio flash trigger vs YONGNUO YN560-TX II LCD flash trigger remote

Key Differences

Neewer (A) offers a lower listed price and supports 16-channel wireless triggering with high-speed sync up to 1/200s, making it suited for users needing HSS and more channel options. YONGNUO (B) is lighter/smaller, reports more reliable long-term operation and easier locking on flashes, so it’s a better pick if build reliability and compactness matter

Neewer 16-channel wireless studio flash trigger

Neewer 16-channel wireless studio flash trigger

NEEWER • ★ 4.0/5 • Budget

Wireless trigger for camera to fire hot shoe flashguns with high-speed sync. Easy installation and low power use. One customer noted reliable triggering with Nikon D80

Pros

  • easy installation
  • low power consumption
  • high-speed sync up to 1/200 second
  • long 30m open-area range

Cons

  • durability concerns after several months
  • mixed battery life feedback
  • sync speed reportedly limited to 1/125th per some reviews
Check current price on Amazon →
YONGNUO YN560-TX II LCD flash trigger remote

YONGNUO YN560-TX II LCD flash trigger remote

YONGNUO • ★ 3.9/5 • Mid-Range

Compact remote controller for Canon and YN560 series flashes with wake-up function. Customers note reliable operation and easy use, with solid build and good value for money

Pros

  • lighter and smaller design
  • lock on flashes easily
  • reliable operation
  • solid build quality

Cons

  • mixed compatibility reports
  • pairing issues reported by some users
Check current price on Amazon →

Head-to-Head

CriteriaWinner
Price NEEWER
Durability YONGNUO
Versatility NEEWER
User Reviews Tie