Roland UM-ONE-MK2 MIDI Interface vs CME MIDI Thru5 WC 1-to-5 MIDI Thru
Overall winner: CME MIDI Thru5 WC 1-to-5 MIDI Thru
Key Differences
CME (A) is a dedicated 1-in-5-out MIDI thru box with a compact, sturdy casing and optocoupler for high-speed, error-free sync, while Roland (B) is a USB bus-powered 1-in/1-out MIDI interface with OS and iPad compatibility and MIDI data indicators. Choose CME if you need to split one MIDI source to five destinations and a rugged hardware thru solution; choose Roland if you need USB connectivity and cross-platform (Mac, Windows, iPad) interface features
Roland UM-ONE-MK2 MIDI Interface
One-in/one-out MIDI interface with USB power and indicators. Compatible with Mac, Windows, and iPad via Camera Connection Kit; highlights low latency and solid build. Customer feedback notes good functionality but some driver issues on newer macOS versions
Pros
- USB bus-powered operation
- one-in/one-out MIDI with data indicators
- Mac, Windows, and iPad compatibility
- integrated USB and MIDI cables
Cons
- incompatibility with newer Mac OS versions
- mixed driver installation experiences
CME MIDI Thru5 WC 1-to-5 MIDI Thru
CME MIDI Thru5 WC provides 1-in-5-out MIDI transmission with high-speed optocoupler for synchronized devices. Customers note solid build and easy setup
Pros
- 1-in-5-out MIDI transmission
- high-speed optocoupler for error-free sync
- compact, sturdy casing
- reliable build quality
Cons
- no data about compatibility details
- no mention of additional features beyond MIDI thru
- limited customer insight on longevity
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | CME |
| Durability | CME |
| Versatility | Roland |
| User Reviews | CME |