Transcend 16GB CF1000 CompactFlash card vs SanDisk 32GB Extreme PRO CompactFlash Card UDMA 7 160MB/s
Overall winner: SanDisk 32GB Extreme PRO CompactFlash Card UDMA 7 160MB/s
Key Differences
SanDisk (A) offers a larger 32GB capacity and higher advertised read/write speeds (up to 160MB/s read and 150MB/s write) while Transcend (B) is a 16GB card with four-channel support and reports of occasional file corruption. Choose SanDisk if you need higher sustained performance and more capacity; choose Transcend if you prefer a smaller-capacity alternative with four-channel design but accept some reported reliability concerns
Transcend 16GB CF1000 CompactFlash card
CompactFlash memory card with high-speed performance for cameras. It offers 160MB/s read and 120MB/s write and supports four-channel data transfer. Customers note fast operation and ample storage, with some reports of data corruption issues
Pros
- high-speed read and write
- four-channel support
- large storage capacity
- built-in BCH ECC for error detection
Cons
- some reports of corrupted files
SanDisk 32GB Extreme PRO CompactFlash Card UDMA 7 160MB/s
CompactFlash memory card for high-speed video and photo capture with up to 160MB/s read and 150MB/s write speeds. Customers report reliability and fast throughput for long shooting sessions
Pros
- high read speed up to 160MB/s
- high write speed up to 150MB/s
- 32GB capacity for long shoots
- reliable performance with DSLR use
Cons
- performance may vary
- based on internal testing
- requires compatible devices
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | SanDisk |
| Durability | SanDisk |
| Versatility | SanDisk |
| User Reviews | SanDisk |