Dorman Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor vs TRQ Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor for various GM vehicles
Overall winner: Dorman Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor
Key Differences
Dorman (A) offers a slightly higher average rating (4.50 from 173 reviews) and is noted for direct replacement fit and reliable performance, while TRQ (B) has fewer reviews (83), slightly lower average rating (4.10) and customer-sourced DIY video support. Choose Dorman if you prioritize higher user ratings and proven direct-replacement fit; choose TRQ if you want an alternative brand with perceived good quality and additional DIY guidance
Dorman Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor
Direct replacement crankshaft position sensor to match original fit and function. Engine control unit inputs preserved when a sensor has failed; durable construction for reliable performance. Customer note: easy to install and good value, with fit in various vehicles
Pros
- direct replacement fit
- easy to install
- reliable performance
- durable construction
Cons
- mixed feedback on power level
TRQ Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor for various GM vehicles
Engine crankshaft position sensor replacement by TRQ. Offers compatibility and DIY video guidance for installation. Customer feedback notes good quality and fit, with mixed functionality
Pros
- good quality perceived
- fitment noted by customers
- DIY video support
- broad compatibility references
Cons
- functionality mixed in reviews
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | Dorman |
| Durability | Dorman |
| Versatility | Dorman |
| User Reviews | Dorman |