Dorman Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor vs TRQ Crankshaft Position Sensor for 97-09 GM 4.8L-6.0L
Overall winner: Dorman Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor
Key Differences
Dorman (A) is the lower-priced option with a higher average rating (4.5 from 173 reviews) and notes of reliable performance and easy direct-replacement fit, making it a safer pick for straightforward swaps. TRQ (B) costs more, advertises broader GM compatibility and includes DIY video guidance, but has a lower average rating (4.1 from 83 reviews) and mixed functionality reports
Dorman Engine Crankshaft Position Sensor
Direct replacement crankshaft position sensor to match original fit and function. Engine control unit inputs preserved when a sensor has failed; durable construction for reliable performance. Customer note: easy to install and good value, with fit in various vehicles
Pros
- direct replacement fit
- easy to install
- reliable performance
- durable construction
Cons
- mixed feedback on power level
TRQ Crankshaft Position Sensor for 97-09 GM 4.8L-6.0L
TRQ crankshaft position sensor for GM vehicles (98-09). Provides sensor replacement with compatibility across multiple references. Customers note good quality and fit, with mixed performance feedback on functionality
Pros
- wide compatibility cues (multiple references)
- adjustable to various GM engines
- includes DIY video guidance
- focus on compatibility and durability
Cons
- functionality feedback mixed
- some customers report it did not work
- value perception varies
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | Dorman |
| Durability | Dorman |
| Versatility | TRQ |
| User Reviews | Dorman |