TP-Link EAP225 Omada AC1350 Wireless AP vs TP-Link EAP110-Outdoor N300 Wireless AP (V3) with PoE
Overall winner: TP-Link EAP225 Omada AC1350 Wireless AP
Key Differences
Pick the EAP225 (A) if you want higher-rated dual-band MU-MIMO performance with Omada SDN and cloud/remote management; it also sits in a more affordable price tier. Choose the EAP110-Outdoor V3 (B) if you need an outdoor-ready, weather-resistant AP with passive PoE support and Omada controller readiness, despite its lower overall rating and mixed signal reports
TP-Link EAP225 Omada AC1350 Wireless AP
Dual-band wireless access point supporting MU-MIMO with 1350 Mbps total speed. Integrates with Omada SDN for centralized cloud management and remote access via Omada app. Customers note easy setup and reliable performance
Pros
- MU-MIMO dual-band speeds up to 1350 Mbps
- Omada SDN integration for centralized control
- Cloud access and remote management via Omada app
- Seamless integration with Omada hardware and software controllers
Cons
- Mixed connectivity reports from some users
- Some features require Omada cloud-based controller plan
TP-Link EAP110-Outdoor N300 Wireless AP (V3) with PoE
Outdoor wireless access point with N300 speed and weatherproof design. Supports secure WPA/WPA2-enterprise and centralized management via Omada SDN; includes a PoE injector for flexible installation. Customers note easy setup and good range, with mixed signal strength reports
Pros
- outdoor weatherproof design
- secure WPA/WPA2-enterprise
- centralized management via Omada
- passive PoE support
Cons
- mixed reports on signal strength
- some devices experience connectivity issues
- speed/performance can vary by use case
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | TP-Link |
| Durability | TP-Link |
| Versatility | TP-Link |
| User Reviews | TP-Link |