Curriculum Development and Design vs High Leverage Practices and Students with Extensive Support Needs
Overall winner: High Leverage Practices and Students with Extensive Support Needs
Key Differences
Product A (Murray Print) focuses specifically on curriculum development and lesson design for students with developmental and intellectual disabilities and is positioned at a more affordable price tier. Product B, authored by multiple faculty, centers on high-leverage practices for students with extensive support needs and has more user reviews and a slightly higher price tier
Curriculum Development and Design
A resource on curriculum development and design for teaching students with developmental and intellectual disabilities. Provides guidance on instructional planning and accessibility. Customer insight: neutral feedback from a single reviewer
Pros
- clear focus on curriculum design
- relevant to teaching students with developmental & intellectual disabilities
- single-source reference for planning
Cons
- features: N/A
- only one review noted
- no additional benefits listed
High Leverage Practices and Students with Extensive Support Needs
Guide on high leverage practices for students with extensive support needs. Focuses on inclusive teaching strategies and evidence-informed approaches for developmental and intellectual disabilities. Customer insight note: mixed sentiments not provided
Pros
- clear focus on high leverage practices
- applicable to students with extensive support needs
- faculty-authored perspectives from multiple researchers
Cons
- no features listed
- no customer-provided insights
- title may be lengthy for some listings
Head-to-Head
| Criteria | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price | Robert Pennington, Melinda Ault, Ginevra Courtade, J. Matt Jameson, Andrea Ruppar |
| Durability | Tie |
| Versatility | Murray Print |
| User Reviews | Robert Pennington, Melinda Ault, Ginevra Courtade, J. Matt Jameson, Andrea Ruppar |